“Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” ― Carl Sagan.
One such phenomenon that captures the wonder of the universe is Quantum Tunneling. Picture this: Split a photon beam. One half races at light speed—obeying the rules. The other? It slams into a wall. But in the quantum realm, walls are…negotiable. Particles don’t “go through”—they cheat! They vanish here and reappear there, like cosmic teleporters. Nimtz measures those renegade photons and—BAM!—they outpace their law-abiding siblings. This is the astonishing reality of Quantum Tunneling.
🔬 Can information travel faster than light? Physicist Günter Nimtz claims he’s done the impossible—sending a microwave signal 4.7 times the speed of light using quantum tunneling! In this controversial experiment, he split a signal, tunneled part through a barrier, and even transmitted Mozart’s 40th Symphony… backwards in time?
I found a documentary from way back; Günter Nimtz explains his own claims:
How does quantum tunneling defy Einstein’s light-speed limit?
Why do physicists like Raymond Chow argue this isn’t true information transfer?
Could this experiment rewrite the rules of time and causality?
Nimtz sparked an international debate: Is this a groundbreaking discovery or a misinterpretation of quantum randomness? Dive into the mind-bending experiment that blurs the line between science fiction and reality—and decide for yourself if timetravel messages could ever be possible.
💬 Comment below: Do you think faster-than-light communication is achievable, or is Einstein still right?
(Spoiler alert: Einstein is right. But not in Zero or One-Dimensional Objects space (0D-1D). Einstein provided crucial insights into the nature of spacetime and gravitation, but he did not directly describe the behavior of quantum mechanics in non-Riemannian spaces.
When there is no time, there is no space (and vice versa). The concept of moving faster than light challenges our understanding of space and time.
…from the photon’s perspective, time does not exist. At the speed of light, time effectively shouts: “HALT!” Whether or not photons actually speak German is irrelevant. Important is: “When there is no time, there is no space.”
One of Günter Nimtz’s claims regarding tunneling is that the tunneling process occurs faster than light. Most physicists concur with this assertion; for instance, Aephraim Steinberg stated that the results on quantum tunneling are “robustly superluminal.” The contention arises from Nimtz’s suggestion that a signal can be transmitted faster than light, which anyone can hear, thereby challenging the no-communication theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem .
The idea of faster-than-light (FTL) communication is largely considered taboo in physics, attributed to the “Fundamental Fysiks” group from Princeton in the 1970s. This group of hippie “fysicists,” who experimented with psychedelics and magic, developed the “no-communication theorem.”
Quantum Counterculture
Like many Americans of the 1960s and 70s, some physicists took part in questioning traditional institutions.
So, on one hand, physicists agree that particles can quantum-tunnel faster than light, while on the other hand, they maintain that this phenomenon cannot be used to transmit information. Yet, it raises the question: if we can perceive such signals, how does this reconcile with the established limits of communication in physics?
Interestingly, Aephraim Steinberg from the University of Toronto has called quantum tunneling “robustly superluminal”:
Quantum Tunnels Show How Particles Can Break the Speed of Light
Recent experiments show that particles should be able to go faster than light when they quantum mechanically “tunnel” through walls.
He has measured this by using “Larmor clocks,” which is a different way of saying he measured the spin of photons before and after entering the tunnel.
So, he transmitted the spin position of a photon at superluminal speed. How is this not “transmitting information?” He transmitted information about the state of the photon, and measured its change after superluminal travel through the quantum tunnel. Didn’t he violate the no-communication theorem? And why is he allowed to transmit information on the photon spin at superluminal speed, and Nimtz from the University of Cologne can’t transmit AM modulated waves with Mozart?
SIMPLIFIED string theory
For simplification, I have described a photon as a quantum entity, a point, or a 0D (zero dimension) brane. The word “brane” comes from the word “membrane” and the physicists who came up with string theory left out the “mem”. When the photon undergoes tunneling, it behaves like a 1D (one-dimensional) string. A 1D string is a “one-brane” membrane, but the physicists who came up with string theory thought it would sound better to give it a different name. I think.
So, in both 0D and 1D contexts, the concepts of time and space, as we know them, do not exist. You need the fourth dimension to have space and time. What I have done here is to illustrate the particle/wave duality.
My simplification has not much in common with “real” string theory. I called it “string” theory because two points (photons) connected by a line look like a string. A string can be a wave. A point is a particle.
However, from the photon’s perspective, time does not exist. At the speed of light, time effectively shouts: “HALT!” Whether or not photons actually speak German is irrelevant. Important is: “When there is no time, there is no space.”
This agrees with time dilation at c.
————————
Second opinion: “A Photon’s Point of View”
by Steve Nerlich (PhD), Director, International Research and Analysis Unit, Australia
“A photons view” by Christopher Vitale of Networkologies and the Pratt Institute
“From a photon’s point of view, it is emitted and then instantaneously reabsorbed. This is true for a photon emitted in the core of the Sun, which might be reabsorbed after crossing a fraction of a millimeter’s distance. And it is equally true for a photon that, from our point of view, has traveled for over 13 billion years after being emitted from the surface of one of the universe’s first stars. So it seems that not only does a photon not experience the passage of time, it does not experience the passage of distance either.” End quote
The photon follows a null geodesic; this is the path that massless particles follow. That’s why it’s called “null”; its interval (its “distance” in 4D spacetime) is equal to zero, and it does not have a proper time associated with it.
Difference of SIMPLIFIED string theory to “real” string theory
In real string theory, any particle, at any time, is a string. In my simplified version, a particle following a null geodesic, not influenced by gravity or fields of any kind, is a 0D (zero dimensional) point.
“Real” string theory vs the simplified version
It is only by interacting with external fields, gravitational, electromagnetic or objects, that the particle (photon) gains the first dimension. The photon is slowed down, and it becomes a “string.” The length of this string is analogous to its deceleration and possible wave “length.”
So, a very high energy-photon, for instance in the gamma ray spectrum, is a relatively short “string,” which translates into a short wavelength. A short string makes short wavelengths.
If the photon is slowed down more, for instance, by hitting the dense atmosphere of a planet, it becomes longer and can express an infrared wavelength. A longer photon string makes longer wavelengths, and it interacts differently with its environment.
The pilots of the USS Nimitz officially tracked the TicToc UFO (or UAP) using the state-of-the-art Spy One Aegis System. Specifically, the phased array (SPY-1(V) [AEGIS]). The radar operator Kevin Day aboard the Nimitz’s consort, USS Princeton, played a pivotal role in this encounter.
This advanced military-grade passive radarsystem comes at a staggering cost of approximately $20 million! (For more info, check out: SPY-1 Wikipedia.)
But what if I told you that you could build your very own passive radar system at a fraction of that price? Imagine tracking not only commercial aircraft and meteorites entering Earth’s atmosphere. You could potentially track UFOs themselves—if luck is on your side!
A bit of SETI Passive Radar history
A temporarily unverified anecdote: In 2018, Peter Davenport, the Director of the National UFO Reporting Center, revealed to a friend that he had contacted Dr. Jill Tarter on February 3, 2014, about his paper advocating the use of “passive” radar to detect UFOs near Earth.
He emphasized that his goal was to propose a collaborative effort for a thorough investigation. However, Dr. Tarter’s reply was brief and somewhat dismissive; she mentioned that she had retired from SETI and would forward his message to Gerry Harp, the new Director.
ET to SETI: can you hear us now?
Despite Davenport’s follow-up attempts, he received no response from Harp, suggesting a reluctance within SETI to engage with UFO research initiatives. My friend described this reaction as surprising, given SETI’s public perception as pioneers in the search for extraterrestrial life.
SETI’s reaction, however (or lack thereof), is not surprising to me.
Firstly,SDRstands for “Software DefinedRadio.” This incredible technology emulates everything you would expect to find in a conventional radio receiver through software. This makes SDR radios much more affordable and loaded with features that traditional counterparts can only dream of!
A depiction of a passive radar experiment from 1935 with two “antennas.” The antennas consist of lengths of cable suspended above the ground. One of the antennas picked up a signal from the BBC directly. Then the second “antenna” picked up the reflection of that same signal from an aircraft, enabling the creation of a radar image. More directional antennas produce better results.
To construct this phenomenal passive radar station, all you need are twoSDR radio dongles for your computer. In 2025 these are priced at $35 each (Amazon.com). Yes, you read that right! You will also need two antennas. (A link to the instructions you find at the end of this page.)
The Magic of Passive Radar
Here’s the best part: you don’t need a license to build and operate a passive radar station! As the name suggests, it operates entirely passively, meaning that your setup does not emit any radar beams.
Instead, you harness radio signals from local radio stations as your signal source. These signals naturally bounce off objects like meteorites, aircraft, or even those elusive UFOs!
Building Your Own SDR-based Passive Radar on a Budget!
Let’s kick things off with proof! Below you’ll find an animation showcasing measurements of airplanes and meteors captured by a radar system created with a few easily accessible components. Get ready to be thrilled!
What can you expect from this DIY Passive Radar? Check out this recording:
Of course, you’ll be much more likely to see plane traffic, meteorites, and low-flying objects like the International Space Station. This is more probable than any more exotic objects passing through your field of view.
The worlds first UFO case confirmed by amateur passive radar!
A round of applause to Josef Garcia and GEP for achieving the first amateur verification of a UFO via passive radar! Link (German):
UAP Case Dataset 20240920 B
On September 20, 2024, at 5:34 a.m. CEST, a UAP sighting occurred in Friesenheim-Oberweier, Germany. A federal police officer reported observing a bright apparition in the clear sky, characterized by a wave-like form with colon-like dots to the left. Subsequent confirmation of the sighting was provided by a signal from a passive radar operated by Josef Garcia, a member of GEP.
Take a look at these remarkable amateur passive radar images contributed by Josef Garcia:
This radar track shows an object doing rapid 80° degree turns. Image courtesy of Josef Garcia, 2021 In comparison the smooth flight path of the ISS. Image courtesy of Josef Garcia, 2021
AI-driven filtering and detection of UFO radar tracks
Unlocking the Skies: How AI Is Revolutionizing UFO Detection
Picture this: a radar blip streaks across the screen at 74,000 km/h (46,000 mph), halts mid-air, then pivots instantly—defying gravity, physics, and every known aircraft on Earth. This isn’t science fiction. These are the jaw-dropping maneuvers that set UFOs apart from conventional planes, drones, or even meteorites. But how do we spot these anomalies in a sea of ordinary radar data? The answer lies in the flight patterns no human pilot or machine could survive—and the AI that’s learning to track them.
UFOs don’t follow the rules.
They hover silently, sometimes for hours, accelerate faster than a hypersonic missile, or execute 90-degree turns at speeds that would shred any human-made craft. While not all UFOs pull off these physics-defying stunts, those that do leave a glaring signature: a trail of radar data that screams “this isn’t from our world.”
But here’s the catch: manually scouring radar feeds for these rare, split-second events is like finding a needle in a cosmic haystack. It’s tedious, time-consuming, and prone to human error. Enter AI-powered pattern recognition—a game-changer in the hunt for the unexplained. Imagine training algorithms to flag the impossible.
Machine learning models can digest decades of radar data, learning the difference between a commercial jet, a weather balloon, and an object that stops dead in the sky before vanishing at Mach 60. These systems never sleep, never blink, and process millions of data points in real time, alerting scientists only when they detect the extraordinary: sudden accelerations, inhuman G-force maneuvers, or objects that defy aerodynamic logic.
(Image: Amateur passive radar setup) Machine learning isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about unlocking mysteries. By automating the detection of UFO signatures, AI turns a once-impossible task into a scalable mission.
Researchers can focus on analysis instead of endless screen-watching, accelerating our understanding of these enigmatic phenomena.
The skies are stranger than we think. And with AI as our co-pilot, we’re finally building the tools to decode their secrets—one anomalous blip at a time. 🛸✨
Ready to rethink what’s possible? The truth isn’t just out there… it’s in the data.
Curious about passive radar technology? (the AI part comes later)
Click below to find out how to built your own Passive-Radar-Station.
Building Your Own SDR-based Passive Radar On A Shoestring
Let’s start off with proof. Below is an animation of a measurement of airplanes and meteors I made using a radar system that I built with a few simple easily available pieces of hardware: two…
New insights on consciousness and self-reflection via temporal feedback.
This is a companion article to:
Superluminal. The Discovery Of Faster-Than-Light Brainwaves: An illustrated journey
Imagine a world where time and space bend, and particles travel faster than light in a different dimension.
Many of the terms used here that may be unfamiliar are explained in the “Superluminal” series of articles listed above ↑. Some concepts presented in this article may be dismissed by theorists. I pay as little attention to these scientists as they pay to me, because my focus is on experimental and experiential results, rather than theoretical debates. Trying to debate evanescent waves with a neurologist is like trying to discuss fine art with a goldfish—everyone’s swimming in different waters!
The WETCOW theory (Weakly-EvanescenT COrtical Waves) proposes a novel link between superluminal evanescent waves—quantum phenomena observed in experiments like the Nimtz Effect—and the emergence of self-reflection, qualia, and consciousness. Here’s a distilled overview of its conceptual pillars:
These waves, studied in quantum tunneling experiments (e.g., the Bose double-prism setup), exhibit apparent faster-than-light propagation. While classical information is superluminally transmitted!, evanescent modes also enable energy transfer across barriers, with phase velocities exceeding c.
The “Nimtz Effect” suggests such waves could create transient, nonlocal correlations in spacetime, theorized here as a “backchannel to the past.” Each reflection or tunneling event might retroject a fractional signal, enabling systems to “look back” temporally.
Consciousness as a Temporal Mirror:
Self-reflection—a hallmark of consciousness—is framed as a process where the brain leverages superluminal evanescent modes to create a feedback loop. The “leading edge of consciousness” is proposed to reside in an evanescent wavefront, allowing qualia (subjective experience) to arise not from the past but as a prospective phenomenon.
This challenges classical models where consciousness lags behind neural activity. Instead, qualia might emerge at the boundary of future possibilities, with evanescent waves enabling retrocausal self-interrogation (“Why did I choose this?”).
Neurobiological Correlates:
Cortical waves (“COWs” in the acronym) or brainwaves could host such effects. Structures like the eyes (metaphorized as “mirrors to the soul”) or layered neural tissues might act as waveguides, amplifying evanescent modes.
The mirror self-recognition test—a marker of self-awareness in some species—is speculated to depend on these dynamics, potentially extending to animals like cows.
Quantum Biology & Temporal Instability:
Radioactive decay in the body (e.g., potassium-40) and endogenous electromagnetic fields (photons) introduce quantum stochasticity. Unstable elements might enhance sensitivity to retrocausal effects, aligning with lab use of quantum random number generators.
Wave-particle duality underscores the theory’s rejection of purely classical or wave-only models (e.g., critiques of Jim Beichler’s magnetic wave cosmos).
Paradoxes and Implications:
If consciousness’s “now” integrates a faint echo of the future via superluminal backchannels, it blurs linear causality. This aligns with Libet-style experiments, where unconscious neural activity precedes conscious intent, yet here the “delay” is reframed as a bidirectional temporal process.
I believe consciousness is an electromagnetic field phenomenon (with Johnjoe McFadden). A “brainwave” is an electromagnetic wave. Brainwaves travel along neuronal pathways. These waves encounter synapses and ganglia. Brainwaves also emit a field. When these electromagnetic fields travel through the highly complex geometry of real brain tissues, they produce evanescent waves.
The “evanescent” waves are very weak, and extend only for a very small distance from their point of origin. Real-world experiments have indicated that they travel faster than light and do transmit information (Günther Nimtz). Here is a video originally aired on the BBC in which Prof. Nimtz explains his findings:
According to Einstein’s theory of special relativity, anything that travels faster than light travels back in time. The Lorentz transformations show that this would also lead to causality violations. Here are the calculations on the Lorentz transformations:
A train of thought experiment
We’re literally going to take the Vulcan Express. https://www.vulkan-express.de/en/ Einstein liked to do thought experiments to illustrate his reasoning to himself and others. I found a way to do this, too, for the faster-than-light brainwave theory.
We are boarding the train at the station. Our cabins are comfortable and old-fashioned. A ticket collector comes along and snips our tickets. As we are leaning back, the locomotive fires up steam, and the wheels slowly begin to turn.
Despite being told not to, we lean out of the window and feel the wind in our hair. The locomotive approaches a tunnel and sounds a horn. It is five to twelve. As soon as we are in the tunnel, it gets dark. We have a steampunk style of mechanical clock that is driven by a solar motor, but there’s no light. We can’t see the time on the clock anyways, because it is dark.
We’re sitting in the dark for a while, and then the tunnel ends. I look at the clock, and the time is the same as when we entered the tunnel, five to twelve. But we are 2 kilometers further down the train track.
So, how does this explain faster-than-light locomotion? Does this explain quantum tunneling?
Time stopped. This metaphor works at least for this aspect.
Self-Reflection as a Function of Superluminal Thought 🐄
Rey, Hall of Mirrors, “The Last Jedi”, 2017The author in front of a mirror, 2018
Paradoxically, the following seven-year-old article about superluminal thought mentions “COWS,” which could be an acronym for “cortical waves” or brainwaves, about five years BEFORE the introduction of the WETCOW theory. Superluminal evanescent waves facilitate self-reflection, which is essential for the experience of qualia and consciousness. However, what if qualia do not occur in the past but instead in the future? The leading edge of consciousness, represented by qualia, aligns with the evanescent wave, which can look back and reflect on its actions (perhaps relating to action potential?).
If you were to ask why I suddenly included COWS in an article about superluminal consciousness in 2018, I must confess that the image of a cow (🐄) unexpectedly appeared in my mind.
Beware of the COW Compare this to this image from 2023 on the left. The transfer of thought from the present to the past is anticipated in superluminal phenomena. Did we experience clairvoyance or a type of temporal remote viewing?
The above text is a commentary and rephrasing of the following article from 2018 (Facebook archive):
March 7, 2018 This level of functioning is called superluminal thought.
Certain theories predict a backchannel to the past to be able to self-reflect and develop a sense of qualia, self-awareness, and consciousness.
It is enabled by the Nimtz Effekt, a quantum tunnel process that enables a superluminal signal transmission over very short distances, respectively, time.
The effect is described in the Bose prism experiment, as total reflection in a double prism.
The total effect in the new theory is that each time a reflection occurs, a tiny part of information is totally reflected by a fraction of a wave into the past.
Nimtz also demonstrated the effect on waveguides and perspex sheets, but this was not well documented in the official news coverage.
Nimtz described the behavior of evanescent modes.
Simply translated, this means the behavior of waves in very short time periods.
A possible structure in the brain?
Such as enabling self-reflection.
When we look at a mirror, we see a reflection and begin to realize it is us.
Lots of literature has been written about this unique feature, shared not by many species (but there definitely are).
Maybe cows, too.
It is one sign of consciousness.
There are others, hence.
The eyes may have a structure for this.
They are also called the mirror to the soul.
Before a thought reaches our consciousness, areas in our brain have already decided on a course of action. We are literally living in the past, consciously, by a fraction of a second.
The more unstable an element, the more pronounced it is to this effect. For this reason, quantum random number generators are in use in laboratory settings.
There are always atoms decaying in our body.
When this happens, radioactivity in the form of electromagnetic waves is released. (But that is not the only process by which electromagnetic waves are generated in our body.)
So we talk about electromagnetic waves, which are bundles of energy called photons. Photons are everywhere.
Here we have the wave/particle duality.
A theory of the cosmos cannot be exclusively based on a wave model of magnetic waves. (In response to Jim Beichler)
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.